[Pkg-mono-devel] gtk-sharp status

Eduard Bloch edi@gmx.de
Sat, 31 Jan 2004 09:17:07 +0100


--6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

#include <hallo.h>
* Alvaro del Castillo [Sat, Jan 31 2004, 09:12:59AM]:

> Last Sunday we talked about gtk-sharp. It seems that until the second
> edition (-0pre1v2) of the mono packages are released, gtk-sharp won't be
> public. Is it correct?

No. -2 waits in the ftp-master incoming queue and=20
is available on http://people.debian.org/~blade/testing/.

> Can I help in any way?

You could help to separate the following assemblies from the gnome-sharp
packages:

/usr/lib/art-sharp.dll
/usr/lib/gconf-sharp-peditors.dll
/usr/lib/glade-sharp.dll
/usr/lib/gnome-sharp.dll
/usr/lib/gtkhtml-sharp.dll
/usr/lib/gda-sharp.dll
/usr/lib/gnomedb-sharp.dll
/usr/lib/rsvg-sharp.dll

Some people want to have each file in a separate package while I don't
really like packages with just one useful file inside. The compromise
could be keeping assemblies that are useful in GNOME context in
gnome-sharp and create few other packages for people that don't want
Gnome but access to just one library. I think about projects that grew
up with gnome but are separated libs now. Good concept is needed.

Regards,
Eduard.
--=20
Um nicht ver=E4nderlich zu scheinen, mu=DF man nur seine Entschl=FCsse so
lange verschweigen, bis man einen davon ausf=FChrt.
		-- Jean Paul

--6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAG2SD4QZIHu3wCMURAtJwAJ4h/sUEGUNjpQz1V3Q4pvFAINfc4wCeLLYr
v9WbNXWI9elIedC9LGxSP9s=
=84G8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi--