From santiago.faci@hispalinux.es Fri Mar 11 23:19:14 2005 From: santiago.faci@hispalinux.es (Santi) Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 00:19:14 +0100 Subject: [Pkg-mono-devel] Re: Pkg-mono-devel -- confirmation of subscription -- request 916868 In-Reply-To: <20050311153141.10273.67354.Mailman@haydn.debian.org> References: <20050311153141.10273.67354.Mailman@haydn.debian.org> Message-ID: <1110583155.2091.1.camel@astable> On Fri, 2005-03-11 at 08:31 -0700, pkg-mono-devel-request@lists.alioth.debian.org wrote: > Pkg-mono-devel -- confirmation of subscription -- request 916868 > > We have received a request from 80.58.47.42 for subscription of your > email address, , to the > pkg-mono-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org mailing list. To confirm the > request, please send a message to > pkg-mono-devel-request@lists.alioth.debian.org, and either: > > - maintain the subject line as is (the reply's additional "Re:" is > ok), > > - or include the following line - and only the following line - in the > message body: > > confirm 916868 > > (Simply sending a 'reply' to this message should work from most email > interfaces, since that usually leaves the subject line in the right > form.) > > If you do not wish to subscribe to this list, please simply disregard > this message. Send questions to > pkg-mono-devel-admin@lists.alioth.debian.org. From rosie313@ijusta.com Tue Mar 15 22:07:57 2005 From: rosie313@ijusta.com (Paul S.) Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 19:07:57 -0300 (GMT+3) Subject: [Pkg-mono-devel] 10 dollars to post your ad! Message-ID: <20050315220757.84ADD19B9DA@server2.ijusta.com> =20 =20

=20

A NEW SEX DATING SITE CONCEPT! WHY?

=20 No monthly fee, pay only for the ads that interested you.
You pay a few cents per click only for th= e ads that interested you. The ads have complete information and contacts= . You can contact or be contacted directly by your own e-mail, messenger,= webcam or cellular!

=20 Get tons of contacts!
You also can be the most contacted pe= rson of the site by making an offer to post your ad at the top! Meaning: = You control the position of your own ad!

We'll give 10 dollars in credits to try this new sex dating site concept= ! You only have to register and wait for the instructions on your activat= ion email. You'll need this password:

Password to win USD 10 credits: MYAFFAIR

=20

O supervulc=E3o do Parque Nacional de = Yellowstone entrou em erup=E7=E3o pela =FAltima vez h=E1 640 mil anos, le= vando o mundo a ter um inverno rigoroso que durou uma d=E9cada e amea=E7o= u a popula=E7=E3o humana de extin=E7=E3o. =20 Para acompanhar a exibi=E7=E3o da superprodu=E7=E3o, a BBC tamb=E9m produ= ziu a s=E9rie Supervolcano: The Truth About Yellowstone (Supervulc=E3o: a= Verdade Sobre Yellowstone), que revela toda a pesquisa que foi feita par= a a realiza=E7=E3o do document=E1rio, com entrevistas com especialistas q= ue monitoram o comportamento do supervulc=E3o. =20 O document=E1rio foi feito com base nas previs=F5es desses especialistas = e nas estrat=E9gias de evacua=E7=E3o de ag=EAncias do governo americano.<= /font>

From cowabonga@juku.kicks-ass.net Sat Mar 19 22:58:34 2005 From: cowabonga@juku.kicks-ass.net (Juhan Kundla) Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 00:58:34 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-mono-devel] mod_mono and xsp have different versions Message-ID: <20050319225834.GB31700@pohjala.ee> Hello! I have trouble getting mod_mono to work by using the latest packages from Sid. When i access the http://localhost/samples i get Internal Server Error from Apache (version 1.3.33). Nothing appears in Apache error.log. The Apache loads mod_mono fine and it also starts the mod-mono-server (i see two processes with ps). Anyway, for debugging i tried to run the mod-mono-server.exe manually -- then i got the following error on the console, when accessing aspx samples via Apache (see the last line of the "screenshot"): juhan@curie:/etc/apache$ sudo su www-data -c "/usr/bin/mono /usr/share/dotnet/bin/mod-mono-server.exe --filename /tmp/.mod_mono_server --appconfigdir /etc/mono-server --root /tmp --verbose" mod-mono-server Adding applications from *.webapp files in directory '/etc/mono-server' Adding applications from config file '/etc/mono-server/debian.webapp' Registering application: Host: localhost Port: any Virtual path: /samples Physical path: /usr/share/asp.net-demos/asp Registering application: Host: localhost Port: any Virtual path: /monodoc Physical path: /usr/share/dotnet/monodoc/web Listening on: /tmp/.mod_mono_server Root directory: /tmp Hit Return to stop the server. In ModMonoWorker.Run: mod_mono and xsp have different versions. The Google gives nothing usable, when i search for the "mod_mono and xsp have different versions" error message. Do you have any clue, what goes wrong? TIA, Juhan PS. The list of installed mono.* packages juhan@curie:/etc/mono-server$ dpkg -l | grep mono ii libmono0 1.0.5-2 libraries for the Mono interpreter ii mono 1.0.5-2 Mono .NET development environment ii mono-apache-se 1.0.5-1 backend for mod_mono Apache module ii mono-assemblie 1.0.5-3 architecture specific files for Mono's ii mono-assemblie 1.0.5-3 Mono class library ii mono-common 1.0.5-2 common files for the Mono CLI runtimes ii mono-jit 1.0.5-2 fast CLI/.NET JIT compiler for Mono ii mono-mcs 1.0.5-3 Mono C# compiler ii mono-utils 1.0.5-2 Mono utilities ii mono-xsp 1.0.5-1 simple web server to run ASP.NET ii monodevelop 0.5.1-2 C#/Java/Nermele/ILasm Development ii monodoc 1.0.4-1 The Mono documentation viewer ii monodoc-base 1.0.4-1 shared MonoDoc binaries ii monodoc-browse 1.0.4-1 MonoDoc GTK+ based viewer ii monodoc-http 1.0.4-1 MonoDoc http based viewer ii monodoc-manual 1.0.4-1 compiled XML documentation from the From cowabonga@juku.kicks-ass.net Sun Mar 20 08:36:36 2005 From: cowabonga@juku.kicks-ass.net (Juhan Kundla) Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 10:36:36 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-mono-devel] Re: mod_mono and xsp have different versions In-Reply-To: <20050319225834.GB31700@pohjala.ee> References: <20050319225834.GB31700@pohjala.ee> Message-ID: <20050320083636.GA5931@pohjala.ee> Hello again! Juhan Kundla kirjutas: > I have trouble getting mod_mono to work by using the latest packages > from Sid. When i access the http://localhost/samples i get Internal > Server Error from Apache (version 1.3.33). Nothing appears in Apache > error.log. [...] > In ModMonoWorker.Run: mod_mono and xsp have different versions. OK, i figured it out myself. The error went away and samples started to work, when i installed the latest libapache-mod-mono (not yet in Sid) from the following archives. deb http://debian.pablo.com.mx ./ Seems like the version of the mod_mono and the version of the other mono packages does not match at the moment in unstable, which caused my troubles. Anyway, thanks guys for the packaging effort. Juhan From c.morrison@iinet.net.au Tue Mar 22 13:40:18 2005 From: c.morrison@iinet.net.au (Cameron Morrison) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 23:40:18 +1000 Subject: [Pkg-mono-devel] libgtksourceview-cil Message-ID: <42402042.3050009@iinet.net.au> Hi, I was wondering how long it will take for the recent fix for bug #292258 in libgtksourceview-cil (conflict with nermele.lang) to make it into the official unstable repository? Thanks, Cameron Morrison ps. I'm not on the list, please cc me on replies. From c.morrison@iinet.net.au Tue Mar 22 13:40:18 2005 From: c.morrison@iinet.net.au (Cameron Morrison) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 23:40:18 +1000 Subject: [Pkg-mono-devel] libgtksourceview-cil Message-ID: <42402042.3050009@iinet.net.au> Hi, I was wondering how long it will take for the recent fix for bug #292258 in libgtksourceview-cil (conflict with nermele.lang) to make it into the official unstable repository? Thanks, Cameron Morrison ps. I'm not on the list, please cc me on replies. From meebey@meebey.net Tue Mar 22 15:54:22 2005 From: meebey@meebey.net (Mirco Bauer) Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 16:54:22 +0100 Subject: [Pkg-mono-devel] libgtksourceview-cil In-Reply-To: <42402042.3050009@iinet.net.au> References: <42402042.3050009@iinet.net.au> Message-ID: <1111506862.4178.9.camel@flyinghorse> --=-Z4CtOoVzPHyppVJ7VKVr Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable It's already in the archive On Tue, 2005-03-22 at 23:40 +1000, Cameron Morrison wrote: > Hi, I was wondering how long it will take for the recent fix for bug=20 > #292258 in libgtksourceview-cil (conflict with nermele.lang) to make it=20 > into the official unstable repository? >=20 > Thanks, > Cameron Morrison >=20 > ps. I'm not on the list, please cc me on replies. >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Pkg-mono-devel mailing list > Pkg-mono-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-mono-devel --=20 Regards, Mirco 'meebey' Bauer PGP-Key: http://keyserver.noreply.org/pks/lookup?op=3Dget&search=3D0xEEF946C8 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GIT d s-:+ a-- C++ UL++++$ P L++$>+++$ E- W+++$ N o? K- w++>! O---- M- V? PS PE+ Y- PGP++ t 5+ X++ R tv+ b+ DI? D+ G>++ e h! r->++ y? ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ --=-Z4CtOoVzPHyppVJ7VKVr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iQEVAwUAQkA/rnEn5avu+UbIAQJVgwf/QVwwyhj5nXgU+LN76zjOrD5RreHDyCdy v9B1P13N2eCozD3DiYdwOQFjTIqRB81BhjvBoYK+Y3ds7e9L/7Fz133bsCwO9d8Z /utNMgBCHLr6H50udXX/hO5XaP19DzcBlUsvtdfxyntra4AjzjMQxCXfDij7MIDH GDXtZskX+OMiZg08pXNikL3hBWG5pIfl3j/1CuXY99ICQ+jZajCcJNk/+oRQtcoV QO6hh0eTANyHwRu6P/bJLJAzxrtBxzsPiYxfaW65r+sUts3VXxKJBFRg+Wd6xr9G Xawm/+zv2D/H2H7X1K9Am2N1oJQmGFIqgb0MO+s37yfSd8Tjof5szw== =gnS6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Z4CtOoVzPHyppVJ7VKVr-- From jsogo@debian.org Thu Mar 24 15:30:06 2005 From: jsogo@debian.org (Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo) Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2005 16:30:06 +0100 Subject: [Pkg-mono-devel] Mono 1.0.6/1.1 Message-ID: <1111678206.7547.8.camel@gimli.tribulaciones.org> --=-wORc2l0zCeiWvdFe1MRc Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I have just completed initial version of Beagle packages (for version 0.0.8). While testing it, I saw that Lucene.NET backend was not working, and I was told in IRC that I should be usig 1.0.6 or 1.1 better. Investigating a bit about this, I saw the MonoDebianPlan in Debian Wiki, which seems to imply that some preliminar work must be done. I would like to know how that is going, or if it is stalled. Thanks for the info and the work Cheers, --=20 Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo jsogo@debian.org --=-wORc2l0zCeiWvdFe1MRc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBCQtz+S+BYJZB4jhERAijyAJ96giO80zJT8txPbasQnWFLUd5jEwCgj+7n R0irwN67CfmtkBjvDEGUtps= =NCS4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-wORc2l0zCeiWvdFe1MRc-- From phuegelm@uni-osnabrueck.de Tue Mar 29 17:21:25 2005 From: phuegelm@uni-osnabrueck.de (Philipp Huegelmeyer) Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 19:21:25 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-mono-devel] Mono 1.0.6/1.1 In-Reply-To: <1111678206.7547.8.camel@gimli.tribulaciones.org> References: <1111678206.7547.8.camel@gimli.tribulaciones.org> Message-ID: <1112116885.7061.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> Am Donnerstag, den 24.03.2005, 16:30 +0100 schrieb Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo: > Hi, >=20 > I have just completed initial version of Beagle packages (for version > 0.0.8). While testing it, I saw that Lucene.NET backend was not working= , > and I was told in IRC that I should be usig 1.0.6 or 1.1 better. >=20 > Investigating a bit about this, I saw the MonoDebianPlan in Debian > Wiki, which seems to imply that some preliminar work must be done. I > would like to know how that is going, or if it is stalled. >=20 > Thanks for the info and the work >=20 > Cheers, >=20 Hi, since I was hit by the same problem, I updated my mono packages in my sarge backport to 1.0.6. They should work with sid as well. Url: http://linuxrepos.info/sarge-mono Beagle 0.0.8.1 works fine with these packages on my sarge box. Cheers, Philipp H=C3=BCgelmeyer =20 From meebey@meebey.net Tue Mar 29 20:31:09 2005 From: meebey@meebey.net (Mirco Bauer) Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 22:31:09 +0200 Subject: [Pkg-mono-devel] Mono 1.0.6/1.1 In-Reply-To: <1111678206.7547.8.camel@gimli.tribulaciones.org> References: <1111678206.7547.8.camel@gimli.tribulaciones.org> Message-ID: <1112128269.11105.1.camel@redbull.qnetp.net> --=-6viaQsyzwh7gVYvn04Cv Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 16:30 +0100, Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo wrote: > ... > I would like to know how that is going, or if it is stalled. >=20 > Thanks for the info and the work it's not stalled but I am short on time... since I plan to do some enhancements also it is not that trivial (for instance a cli-common package). --=20 Regards, Mirco 'meebey' Bauer PGP-Key: http://keyserver.noreply.org/pks/lookup?op=3Dget&search=3D0xEEF946C8 -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.12 GIT d s-:+ a-- C++ UL++++$ P L++$>+++$ E- W+++$ N o? K- w++>! O---- M- V? PS PE+ Y- PGP++ t 5+ X++ R tv+ b+ DI? D+ G>++ e h! r->++ y? ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------ --=-6viaQsyzwh7gVYvn04Cv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) iQEVAwUAQkm7DXEn5avu+UbIAQIUUQf/bMXKcjAybU8RbHJnyRtPbTqzF2bdQPTG v9nGo5DQfufmWbmzy4KzR8Tq7kX6rGo3ZhkDyCynwsasQOzchyT0rOfBT7Xp53gl fSLRQjngLCbnO/2VnQc+V0dq0JZOcQg7g10lAGrPrTALkrqq6Akdprh8g+sDMgeV eHtYfNRDqoXRkUScsdorNyd3SJzuYcGZHwndtFQHc+boiBgz8vrJXqMWOqy13etZ f6O/n6MBiVI+C//ctCN+X2dkVsvAU0wNypJWgeJyTgJ5gdOHeoZWZ7It8H44zm73 jp7icXrqx+mX0pBYIsNX3KlaRtkqdmkdhJGFXtOcOF2OSXlkTv49fg== =znWj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-6viaQsyzwh7gVYvn04Cv--