[Pkg-mono-devel] Best way to solve a file conflict between packages?

Davide Puricelli evo at debian.org
Tue Mar 31 21:46:01 UTC 2009


On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 01:04:23PM +0200, David Paleino wrote:
> I'm *NOT* talking in behalf of the Debian Mono Group, but I really think we
> shouldn't break existing scripts/programs/workflows/whatever, and call our
> binary as cli-csc.

Hi guys,

according to this message and the previous ones posted in this thread,
I think we can try to reach a consensus without taking this discussion on
-devel.
I have the feeling we all agree that best solution right now it's to
revert the naming change in the mono-devel package, but I'd like to hear
an "official" statement from the Mono team, is it OK for you guys?
I know, it's not the perfect solution, but it's the most near to it, I
guess.

Thanks in advance.

Regards,
-- 
Davide Puricelli, dpuricelli at tin.it
Debian Developer: evo at debian.org | http://www.debian.org

Time looked like snow dropping silently into a black room -- Ray Bradbury
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-mono-devel/attachments/20090331/36ccb132/attachment.pgp 


More information about the Pkg-mono-devel mailing list