[Pkg-mozext-maintainers] libxul vs. libxul-embedding

[Daniel Kahn Gillmor]

On 04/14/2010 03:41 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 03:19:35AM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>> ah, ok, that's one less confusion for me ;)  Will you file it in the
>> appropriate place or should i?
>
> It's already fixed in my local branch. Expect the next xulrunner upload
> to be fixed.

Thanks, Mike!

> Yes, frozen interfaces are the stable ones.

interesting.  So if i build something against 1.9.1 that needs to 
include header files from unstable, do i need to be linking against 
something else then?  It looks to me like all the documentation about 
the xpcom glue refers strictly to the frozen/stable stuff.

 > Please note that there isn't
 > a distinction between stable and unstable in xulrunner 1.9.2.

Is that because the APIs are actually stabilizing?  Or because they're 
all unstable in 1.9.2?

	--dkg