[Pkg-mozext-maintainers] #573250 -- conflict between policy and mozilla-devscripts about file placement

Benjamin Drung bdrung at ubuntu.com
Wed Mar 10 22:52:56 UTC 2010


Am Mittwoch, den 10.03.2010, 17:43 -0500 schrieb Daniel Kahn Gillmor:
> On 03/10/2010 04:46 PM, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > I think we shouldn't clutter /usr/share and /usr/lib with one directory
> > per extension.
> 
> That seems like a reasonable concern to me.  What if we used
> /usr/share/xul-ext/foo (or /usr/lib/xul-ext/foo for arch-dependent
> packages)?  it certainly seems tidier.

Great idea. I like it. Patches are welcome. ;)

-- 
Benjamin Drung
Ubuntu Developer (www.ubuntu.com) | Debian Maintainer (www.debian.org)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-mozext-maintainers/attachments/20100310/116addf4/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Pkg-mozext-maintainers mailing list