[Pkg-mozext-maintainers] Bug#738773: wheezy-pu: package firebug/1.12.6-1~deb7u1

[David Prévot]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hi release team,

Le 12/02/2014 16:28, David Prévot a écrit :

> I’m sorry to ask for such a request again, but it seems like the less
> ugly way to handle the new ESR-support of iceweasel in stable…

AFAICT, there has not been any feedback about such update for
mozilla-extension (including #739069 for sage-extension and #739075 for
flashblock), so I’m not sure how to handle the few other RC bugs
affecting stable only (#740539 for mozilla-noscript and #739023 for
greasemonkey) that may fall under the same conditions.
- - Should I open the same kind of release.d.o ticket?
- - Would you prefer another approach?

> I’m happy to keep the 1.12.6-1 in Sid and Jessie as long as needed to
> hopefully get as much testing as possible with the current iceweasel 24

While I’ve actually been packaging 1.13 alpha releases to experimental,
I wonder if I should stick to 1.12.6 in Sid (while 1.12.7 “represents a
maintenance release fixing […] compatibility issues with upcoming
Firefox versions”[1]). In other words:
- - what is your take in keeping 1.12.6-1 in Sid?
- - Would you mind if we were to update this pu request about
1.12.7-1~deb7u1?

	1: https://blog.getfirebug.com/2014/03/05/firebug-1-12-7/

Regards

David


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJTKhCgAAoJEAWMHPlE9r08e2kIAIn1coI4tDqC5M2MZehBNRa6
2J73EmitOvl5hcZdR9pmKGSTXNSPOcpwT79N1bcaLgKB+ZqrFQsXQ7lUhNglI1L6
/ywXAxv+SXfYR1oPY8c9HXsSh2QC6fAgLNbkHhWYrExGqqrLj2Sxj8CltWaMtqsm
3+Icna25uVR6FQ1th5sTpJxVUM/PU3LpgEwSzcxIPOpCoMJbWa5fC6kX9wgGknRQ
LAaJpJPmoq5eZxqbBfEuFVfJcUYy2drYHGjdPuZSFME3U/FlmNehZe6p/y2Je/Oq
/2bu7/fIiJ6642WjVVqt048+YwBFxrgabP3mG0qTzX+CPy3TcHClP58xY8dwYLY=
=IGko
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----