Security updates for mozilla based software [Was:
Security updates]
Eric Dorland
eric at kuroneko.ca
Mon Dec 25 20:56:47 UTC 2006
Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 01:43:40PM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
>> Oops, I decided to follow-up to debian-release after setting the subject
>> and forgot to change it. So, here is a proper subject.
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 01:40:37PM +0100, Mike Hommey <mh at glandium.org> wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I see Alex has uploaded version 1.5.0.9 of icedove. What should we take
>>> as a course of action for xulrunner, iceweasel and iceape ?
>>> Should we go with newer upstreams (note there's no official xulrunner
>>> release, but I fake them taking from tags in upstream cvs) or backport
>>> security fixes ?
>>>
>
> Please lets upload new upstream versions as long as possible - e.g. as
> long as etch is not released. Those are just minor upstream version
> shifts, so taking them entirely should be pretty safe imo.
Right, I agree. In fact I'm building 2.0.0.1 packages right now on my
laptop, but I might need you to sign and upload them Mike. Sorry it's
taken me a while, life's been very busy the last month.
More information about the pkg-mozilla-maintainers
mailing list