seamonkey progress

Mike Hommey mh at glandium.org
Tue Oct 3 21:28:56 UTC 2006


On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 11:17:59PM +0200, Alexander Sack <asac at jwsdot.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 10:56:24PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 10:01:35PM +0200, Alexander Sack <asac at debian.org> wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 09:54:57PM +0200, Alexander Sack wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 09:50:35PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > Damn. But than, if thunderbird and seamonkey are based on the same
> > > > > codebase, you can build with thunderbird-dev, it will work with
> > > > > seamonkey.
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Maybe ... but it makes no sense imo. Just produce headers from the
> > > > source-base the libs are build from ... everything else is just a
> > > > risky game ... and we cannot guarantee that code-base will always be
> > > > in sync.
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > And remember, as soon as seamonkey et al are build against xulrunner,
> > > the -dev package will not provide duplicate headers anymore. Just
> > > those that are application specific. For me -dev package make sense
> > > for all app-components in the long run: browser, mail, composer, etc.
> > 
> > But yet, you don't need two enigmail components
> > 
> 
> What makes you so sure about this?

Did you try and failed ?

Mike



More information about the pkg-mozilla-maintainers mailing list