seamonkey progress III

[Alexander Sack]

On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 02:15:33PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> * Alexander Sack (asac at jwsdot.com) wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 06:53:03PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 04:53:39PM +0200, Alexander Sack <asac at jwsdot.com> wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 04:41:20PM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 03:32:31PM +0200, Alexander Sack <asac at debian.org> wrote:
> > > > > > > That's about it!
> > > > > > > One last thing: which version should go into Etch? 1.0.5 or 1.1 ? And
> > > > > > > who to ask about this?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I can't tell ... I don't think final 1.8.1 branch versions will be out
> > > > > > in time for the freeze ... so probably we should go the safe way and
> > > > > > use the 1.8.0 branch versions (aka 1.0.5 for your case).
> > > > > 
> > > > > See the thread starting at
> > > > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2006/09/msg00300.html
> > > > > As far as the new branch packages are tested, we can expect exceptions to
> > > > > push them into etch, which should be better for everyone.
> > > > 
> > > > Mike, unless you want to help supporting security on the long run and
> > > > have time to do so and assuming thunderbird 2.0 won't make it, I
> > > > cannot provide security for two branches ... really. Please lets use
> > > > the same branch for everything.
> > > 
> > > Damn, when is thunderbird 2.0 due, again ?
> > 
> > Dunno ... I just red your post to debian-release. There you said "End
> > of Nov".
> 
> Hmmm, which post was that? 
> 

See above :) (?http.*debian-release)

 - Alexander
-- 
 GPG messages preferred.    |  .''`.  ** Debian GNU/Linux **
 Alexander Sack             | : :' :      The  universal
 asac at debian.org            | `. `'      Operating System
 http://www.asoftsite.org/  |   `-    http://www.debian.org/