Bug#309564: cacert certificate

[martin f krafft]

also sprach Mike Hommey <mh at glandium.org> [2008.07.12.1417 +0200]:
> Thanks Martin. I only have one concern with your patch (well, two,
> actually): I'm not sure how the library version is being used, but
> surely, we should take care there won't be a problem with us
> having a somehow conflicting version number with upstream (next
> time they add a CA, they are likely to use this version ; are we
> going to keep increasing this version compared to upstream ?)

This is a very good point. I don't know what the version number is
for, but maybe it'll be sufficient to not bump the version number.
I'll try it out...

> My second concern is that your patch looks like a NUMdiff, but is
> not using dpatch like the rest of the package. But don't care too
> much about that, that's just nitpicking ;)

I hate dpatch. End of discussion. :)

-- 
 .''`.   martin f. krafft <madduck at debian.org>
: :'  :  proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user
`. `'`   http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
 
if you see an onion ring -- answer it!
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/)
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-mozilla-maintainers/attachments/20080712/dae26352/attachment-0001.pgp