Bug#567746: dh_xulrunner missed dependency in xiphos

Mike Hommey mh at glandium.org
Mon Feb 1 15:38:34 UTC 2010


On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 03:29:44PM +0000, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> On 1 February 2010 07:42, Mike Hommey <mh at glandium.org> wrote:
> >
> > Nope, all the terms don't match: %s/libxul.so doesn't, and it's my
> > fault (a change in xulrunner 1.9.1.6-1).
> >
> 
> Well I'm not an expert =) just tried my best in triaging this.
> 
> > I'll add a check in xulrunner build to make sure dh_xulrunner still
> > works with new versions.
> >
> 
> Ok thanks =) and I'll do bmu for xiphos after that.

I'll check if other packages have been built against xulrunner 1.9.1.6
and if they lost a dependency as a consequence. I'll probably file
binnmu requests after that.

> > Thanks for spotting the problem.
> >
> 
> Your welcome
> 
> > Mike
> >
> > PS: Note that before using dh_xulrunner, xiphos didn't have a xulrunner
> > dependency, iirc, and therefore, wasn't working properly either ;)
> >
> 
> /me is pretending it was nothing to do with me.... how many RC bugs
> was it again? =)))))

Only 4 ;)

Mike





More information about the pkg-mozilla-maintainers mailing list