New component in xulrunner

Mike Hommey mh at glandium.org
Thu Feb 4 15:10:49 UTC 2010


On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 04:05:57PM +0100, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Hi Mike,
> 
> very interesting blog posts on Planet Debian. :-)
> 
> Will xulrunner 1.9.2 get a new binary package name, too, e.g.
> xulrunner-1.9.2?

Yes it will.

> And shall I already add it as alternative dependency in the conkeror
> package? At least some users in #conkeror says, conkeror already works
> fine with 1.9.2.

If conkeror is known to work with xulrunner 1.9.2, you may do that.
Just be aware that it will be in experimental.

> On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 07:53:11AM +0100, Mike Hommey wrote:
> [cmdline.preventDefault]
> > Actually, this time the component does the right thing, except conkeror
> > doesn't: the component sets cmdLine.preventDefault to true, in which
> > case conkeror shouldn't be doing anything.
> 
> The following patch against conkeror seems to fix the problem for me
> and doesn't seem to have any side effects on a first glance.

Looks sensible.

Cheers,

Mike



More information about the pkg-mozilla-maintainers mailing list