ffmpeg status?

[Fabian Greffrath]

Reinhard Tartler schrieb:
> The comment is obsolete. The current package in testing has altivec
> disabled.

Oops, I didnt' realize that...

> See #484586

Yes, I know about these bugs, I've just closed one.

I do not believe that it's our fault if Marillat changes package names 
without conflicting against his own older packages. But, well, since 
it doesn't cost anything, we may Conflicts against his unofficial 
packages, of course...

> called 'ffmpeg-risky', as discuss previously on this mailing list. The
> 'ffmpeg' called source package would then indicate
> http://debian-multimedia.org as origin.

Again, I don't understand why the "official" ffmpeg package from the 
Debian archive should leave the name 'ffmpeg' to an unofficial 
repository. It's *us* who provide the Debian ffmpeg packages and I 
believe we should care about private unofficial archives as least as 
possible.

> As you might have noticed, I've started to use bzr-svn when working on
> the last upload. 

Erm, no, how could I notice this?

Cheers,
Fabian