fsateler at gmail.com
Thu Aug 13 00:07:45 UTC 2009
El miércoles 12 de agosto, Reinhard Tartler escribió:
> Felipe Sateler <fsateler at gmail.com> writes:
> > Good to know we officially maintain it :p. So this is basically a more
> > official debian-multimedia.org?
> no comment.
That was an honest question. debian-multimedia.org is just an additional
repository with packages. Does debimedia intend to be just that or something
> > Hmm, I think there is a big overlap with what agnula/studio64 does. Is
> > the scope of debimedia much narrower than that of Studio64? (Ie, no
> > installation images, etc etc?).
> AFAIUI agnula/studio64 focus on jack and other semi-professional audio
> related packages. debimedia currently has:
> * ffmpeg-extra
> * lame
> * libquicktime-extra
> * xvidcore
> TBH, I don't see any overlap here. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Well, Studio64 is basically Debian plus a few extra packages and a different
kernel. It could have been possible to take advantage of their infrastructure.
Although if you plan a closer integration with Debian, it makes sense to keep
it as small as possible.
> > How will we manage bugs to those packages, since they won't have the
> > BTS infrastructure?
> As interim solution, I'd suggest to use either alioth tickets or
> launchpad.net until we find a better solution.
OK. Perhaps it will be possible to convince the bts admins to allow us to use
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers