jack Debian packaging?

[Felipe Sateler]

El 18/03/09 07:13 Reinhard Tartler escribió:
> Free Ekanayaka <freee at debian.org> writes:
> >   FS> Because the actual package name transition has been made, most
> > binary FS> packages will continue to be installable (for example csound,
> > which I FS> maintain, does not build-depend on libjack-dev but still
> > depends on FS> libjack0), but they will FTBFS anyway.
> >
> > If we go down this route, I think it makes sense to remove the
> > libjack0.100.0-0 transitional package as well. That will make the
> > binary packages you mention uninstallable, but as they must be
> > re-uploaded anyway without the libjack0.100.0-dev build dependency,
> > that shouldn't be a problem.
>
> oh, I thought we were only taking about the libjack0.100.0-0
> transitional package. Yes, let's get rid of both of them in the next
> upload!

We shoul probably get an ack from the release team before uploading. I will 
write now to debian-devel and BCC debian-release.

Saludos,
Felipe Sateler
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20090318/0acc8853/attachment.pgp