fsateler at gmail.com
Fri Nov 6 01:21:01 UTC 2009
On Fri, 2009-11-06 at 01:29 +0100, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
> > Od: Felipe Sateler <fsateler at gmail.com>
> FS > Package: release.debian.org
> FS > Severity: normal
> FS > User: release.debian.org at packages.debian.org
> FS > Usertags: transition
> FS > New upstream liblo bumps SONAME, so we need to transition. Also, we take
> FS > this opportunity to change the -dev package name to unversion it.
> FS > liblo-dev now provides liblo0-dev to avoid breaking too many packages.
> FS > However, rosegarden and sineshaper have versioned build-dependencies on
> FS > liblo0-dev. They both require versions already in oldstable, so a simple
> FS > NMU dropping the versioning is enough for them. All other packages
> FS > should require binNMUs, and the new version is supposed to be
> FS > API-compatible with the old one.
> Hi Felipe,
> sorry for newbie like question I don't understand how this process should be done.
> Can I help with it somehow?
> btw lv2fil and zynjacku package I would like get uploaded will take advantage from new liblo version.
Basically, we are waiting for the release team's approval to upload the
new version to unstable. Because there cannot be any packages that are
not built by any source, the new liblo (package name liblo7) cannot
migrate into testing until all the applications that use liblo
(depending on package liblo0ldbl) are ready to migrate too, so that the
old liblo package can be removed at the same time. This process gets
complicated if several libraries are transitioning, since they may get
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers