Re: transition: liblo

[Jaromír Mikeš]

> Od: Felipe Sateler <fsateler at gmail.com>

FS> New upstream liblo bumps SONAME, so we need to transition. Also, we take
FS> this opportunity to change the -dev package name to unversion it.
FS> liblo-dev now provides liblo0-dev to avoid breaking too many packages.
FS> However, rosegarden and sineshaper have versioned build-dependencies on
FS> liblo0-dev. They both require versions already in oldstable, so a simple
FS> NMU dropping the versioning is enough for them. All other packages
FS> should require binNMUs, and the new version is supposed to be API-compatible
FS> with the old one.

FS> Direct reverse dependencies:
 
FS> ardour
FS> csound
FS> dssi
FS> fluidsynth-dssi
FS> freej
FS> hexter
FS> jamin
FS> ll-scope
FS> nekobee
FS> qtractor
FS> rosegarden*
FS> sineshaper*
FS> whysynth
FS> wsynth-dssi
FS> xsynth-dssi

Hi Felipe, Free

just noticed that ardour was uploaded with "old" liblo0-dev dependency.
Maybe we can change  "liblo0-dev" to "liblo-dev | liblo0-dev" in all pkg-multimedia repositories (hope it is fine in team working) and then contact maintainers of other packages which are not pkg-multimedia members to do it also.

regards

mira