jamin not install runtime dependency
dr at jones.dk
Fri Apr 2 12:37:46 UTC 2010
Hi Jaromír (and others),
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 07:18:38AM -0400, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
>On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 12:06:21PM +0200, Jaromír Mikeš wrote:
>> I just notice that jamin 0.97.14~cvs~81203-2 is not installing it's
>> runtime dependency swh-plugins.
>> Should I fill bugreport or just inform this way is fine?
>Probably best to file a bug so it doesn't get lost.
I agree with Eric generally: Best to always file a bugreport when you
notice an bug, no matter how tiny: It is quite easy to close again if it
turns out to be a non-issue (if you ever have the sad experience of
being yelled at for filing a "wrong" bugreport then just ignore it:
bugreports are generally highly appreciated, despite a few developers
misunderstanding their purpose. :-)
...but this particular one is hereby on my radar:
I am to blame for recently lowering the dependency on swh-plugins to a
recommendation, with other LDASP plugins fullfilling same.
Are the swh-plugins _always_ needed for _all_ uses of JAMin?
Are perhaps _some_ LADSPA plugin _always_ needed for _all_ uses?
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers