jamin not install runtime dependency

[Jonas Smedegaard]

On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 09:53:38AM -0400, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
>On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 02:37:46PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> Hi Jaromír (and others),
>> Are the swh-plugins _always_ needed for _all_ uses of JAMin?
>
>JAMin being a audio mastering app that doesn't work without the plugins 
>(as I understand it), I would say this is a yes.

swh-plugins is a _specific_ set of LADSPA plugins.  There are other 
LADSPA plugins which I (blindly, I must confess) assumed would fulfill 
the need too.

I do not follow your logic that professional=swh-plugins (or even th 
implicit one that professional=LADSPA) - did I perhaps misunderstand 
your point somehow?


>> Are perhaps _some_ LADSPA plugin _always_ needed for _all_ uses?
>
>I can't see this being true for all packages.

Oh, I think we talk past each other.  Let me try reversing the question: 
Is JAMin completely useless if there are no LADSPA plugins installed at 
all?

And similarly the first question reversed: Is JAMin completely useless 
if those specific LADSPA plugins contained in the swh-plugins plackage 
are not installed (even if other LADSPA modules are installed)?


>But, I may be just chattering idly again, contributing to the noise 
>floor ...

If nothing else you helped reveal that my questions was ambiguous :-)


Regards,

  - Jonas

-- 
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20100402/98e5345b/attachment.pgp>