[SCM] lives packaging branch, master, updated. debian/1.3.2-1-1-gbde7f5e

[Harry Rickards]

On 10 April 2010 15:22, Harry Rickards <harry at linux.com> wrote:
> On 10 April 2010 15:03, Reinhard Tartler <siretart at tauware.de> wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 14:39:54 (CEST), Harry Rickards wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Friday, April 9, 2010, Alessio Treglia <quadrispro at ubuntu.com> wrote:
>>>> On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 8:28 AM, Reinhard Tartler <siretart at tauware.de> wrote:
>>>>> did you mean to write 'sparc' instead of 'sparc64'? Debian does not have
>>>>> a pure 64bit sparc port (yet).
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I think Harry actually means sparc64, 'cause of this failure [1].
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/package.php?p=lives#fail-lives-sparc64
>>>
>>>
>>> Yeah I did. Any advice on what to do?
>>
>> file a bug against lintian to make sparc64 a recognized architecture?
>>
>
>
> The bug's already been filed
> (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=563495) and fixed in
> v2.3.4. Lintian 2.3.4 doesn't give me this error. Alessio, can you
> upgrade to 2.3.4 (in unstable and testing) and confirm that? The error
> is reported at lintian.debian.org, however lintian.debian.org says
> it's running 2.3.4. Is there a way to request a rescan of lives using
> the new version or similar?
>


Alternatively, because lives can't enter testing because of the build
failure on mipsel which should be fixed in the patches I added in Git,
would it be better just to upload a new Debian revision (1.3.2-2)?



-- 
Harry Rickards - harry at linux.com
Vote Lib Dem - Building a fairer Britain - http://libdems.org.uk