packaging policy (was: debian/source/format for LiVES)

Sun Apr 25 17:18:23 UTC 2010

On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 07:10:52PM +0200, Benjamin Drung wrote:

>Let's recommend dh7 and make it mandatory for new packages. We should 
>let the uploader decide, when it's the right time to switch from CDBS 
>to dh7.

Why, if I may ask?

dh7 is not a successor for CDBS.

Kind regards,

  - Jonas

-- 
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20100425/3489a1f6/attachment-0001.pgp>