raise severity of usertag drop-versioned-libjack bugs
jonas at jones.dk
Mon Apr 26 17:53:41 UTC 2010
On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 01:20:16PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 01:16, Jonas Smedegaard <jonas at jones.dk> wrote:
>> Our JACK packaging has now contains jackd2 (no longer jackd1).
>> Upstream has promised a frozen library API equal to that of jackd1
>> 0.116.2, and both shlibs file and symbols file reflect that.
>> The library packages no longer provide packwards compatibility with
>> libjack0.100.0-dev. The following packages dependend on that and are now
>> broken is unstable:
>Why? There is no harm in keeping libjack0.100.0-dev.
You are right: I confused ABI with API.
I'll add back that virtual package which was apparently dropped
accidentally - when posting before I had only discovered and reflected
on what to do about it (with wrong outcome - thanks for correcting!).
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers