raise severity of usertag drop-versioned-libjack bugs

Jonas Smedegaard jonas at jones.dk
Mon Apr 26 17:53:41 UTC 2010

On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 01:20:16PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 01:16, Jonas Smedegaard <jonas at jones.dk> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Our JACK packaging has now contains jackd2 (no longer jackd1).
>> Upstream has promised a frozen library API[1] equal to that of jackd1
>> 0.116.2, and both shlibs file and symbols[2] file reflect that.
>> The library packages no longer provide packwards compatibility with
>> libjack0.100.0-dev.  The following packages dependend on that and are now
>> broken is unstable:
>Why? There is no harm in keeping libjack0.100.0-dev.

You are right: I confused ABI with API.

I'll add back that virtual package which was apparently dropped 
accidentally - when posting before I had only discovered and reflected 
on what to do about it (with wrong outcome - thanks for correcting!).

  - Jonas

* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20100426/4474e4ca/attachment.pgp>

More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list