[SCM] ardour Debian packaging branch, master, updated. debian/2.8.11-1-2-geb65099
dr at jones.dk
Wed Aug 4 16:16:53 UTC 2010
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 08:24:58AM -0400, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
>On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 22:25:56 (EDT), Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 07:07:47PM -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>>On 29/07/10 22:39, js at users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
>>>> The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
>>>> commit eb65099ff8e46f626de4dc308f0d68a2759eb31c
>>>> Author: Jonas Smedegaard <dr at jones.dk>
>>>> Date: Sun May 16 17:50:28 2010 +0200
>>>> Recommend iceweasel and only fallback on virtual www-browser, and
>>>> drop superfluous fallback on firefox.
>>> The firefox fallback is useful on Ubuntu systems. As it is harmless
>>> in debian, I suggest keeping it to avoid Ubuntu/Debian diffs.
>> I develop package for a distribution called Debian.
>Various members of this team care for both distros, and I'd like this
>team to be open for any Ubuntu Member or Developer as well. We even
>carry ubuntu branches here.
I care for Debian, which implies that I care for users of Debian.
Ubuntu and other derivatives are users of Debian, and I care for them!
I am open to contributions from any and all Debian derivative. Ideally
all Debian-derived distributions would work together with us here at
I am not, however, open to include non-Debian pieces in binary packages
targeted Debian. Such pieces belong to different branches in our shared
>> I am very happy that other distributions branch off of that work, as
>> long as not imposing their clutches/hacks/improvements/whatever on
>> Debian. Giving back makes me extra happy - both when done by
>> distributions and by individuals. But as this is useless to Debian
>> and slightly clutters the package dependencies, I dislike it.
>firefox might be reintroduced to debian.
If/when that happens, it makes sense to add it back. Not before.
>> This is my personal opinion, and if stubborn and fanatic compared to
>> consensus in this team, I shall not hold you from imposing other
>> styles on this or other packages - I can simply avoid packages I feel
>> are cluttered instead of cleaning them up.
>okay, then let's readd firefox in the list here.
If you consider it more important than have me do tidying for that
particular package, then sure - go ahead...
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers