package name prefix for Pd docs?

[Felipe Sateler]

On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 18:55, Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans at at.or.at> wrote:
>
> hey all,
>
> I'd like to start packaging some of the interactive documentation projects
> for Pure Data.  Currently we are using the pd-* prefix for Pd libraries, now
> I am wondering whether we should have a separate prefix for Pd
> documentation.  I think there are currently four projects that I'd like to
> package: pd-msg, playnow, messageoddness, pddp tutorials.
>
> So these are not like -doc packages because they are standalone projects not
> associated with a lib or app.  They are more like books, but they are all
> interactive, runnable scripts. I could see these names:
>
>
> pd-msg
> playnow
> messageoddness
> pddp-tutorials
>
> -or-
>
> pd-msg-doc
> playnow-doc
> messageoddness-doc
> pddp-tutorials-doc
>
>
> Here are some similar packages that I found:
> perlprimer-doc
> rubybook
>
> Thoughts, suggestions, comments?
>

I would keep the pd- prefix on these packages, and just append a -doc suffix.


-- 

Saludos,
Felipe Sateler