package name prefix for Pd docs?
fsateler at debian.org
Fri Dec 17 00:04:00 UTC 2010
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 18:55, Hans-Christoph Steiner <hans at at.or.at> wrote:
> hey all,
> I'd like to start packaging some of the interactive documentation projects
> for Pure Data. Currently we are using the pd-* prefix for Pd libraries, now
> I am wondering whether we should have a separate prefix for Pd
> documentation. I think there are currently four projects that I'd like to
> package: pd-msg, playnow, messageoddness, pddp tutorials.
> So these are not like -doc packages because they are standalone projects not
> associated with a lib or app. They are more like books, but they are all
> interactive, runnable scripts. I could see these names:
> Here are some similar packages that I found:
> Thoughts, suggestions, comments?
I would keep the pd- prefix on these packages, and just append a -doc suffix.
More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers