adding a binary package to pd-cyclone

Jonas Smedegaard dr at jones.dk
Wed Dec 29 23:53:45 UTC 2010


On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 08:14:57PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>You edited debian/control, but Jonas added debian/control.in for 
>build-dependencies autogeneration. If you disagree about the use of 
>debian/control.in, we should disable it. If not, we should use it. But 
>having it and not using it does not seem a sane option.

I suggest we only drop the control.in if noone use the .in file or it 
annoys someone.

I see no big problem in some of us editing the control file directly - 
the nuissence of sync'ing changes there to the .in file is shadowed by 
the benefit of dependency semi-autoresolving IMO.

(please do edit the .in file rather than the control file if you want to 
help minimize work for everyone, though)


  - Jonas

-- 
  * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
  * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20101230/85292a35/attachment-0001.pgp>


More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list