adding a binary package to pd-cyclone

Hans-Christoph Steiner hans at at.or.at
Fri Dec 31 05:51:47 UTC 2010


On Thu, 2010-12-30 at 00:53 +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 08:14:57PM -0300, Felipe Sateler wrote:
> >You edited debian/control, but Jonas added debian/control.in for 
> >build-dependencies autogeneration. If you disagree about the use of 
> >debian/control.in, we should disable it. If not, we should use it. But 
> >having it and not using it does not seem a sane option.
> 
> I suggest we only drop the control.in if noone use the .in file or it 
> annoys someone.
> 
> I see no big problem in some of us editing the control file directly - 
> the nuissence of sync'ing changes there to the .in file is shadowed by 
> the benefit of dependency semi-autoresolving IMO.
> 
> (please do edit the .in file rather than the control file if you want to 
> help minimize work for everyone, though)

Ok, I hope its alright with everyone, I removed the control.in.  I can
see using automatic build-depends generation on a package with complex
Build-Depends, but this one is really simple, and I think the
Build-Depends will rarely change, if ever.



More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list