Jack2 in debian

[rosea grammostola]

Adrian Knoth wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 07, 2010 at 10:27:12AM +0100, rosea grammostola wrote:
>
>   
>> Hi,
>>     
>
> Hi!
>
>   
>> I'm not sure you saw my message on LAD, so here it is again:
>>     
>>> But I suggest you to enable both --classic and --dbus for Debian,  
>>>       
>
> Yep, I saw it and acted accordingly:
>
>    http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/jack-audio-connection-kit.git;a=commitdiff;h=53ebc95b5bf32a6f6fafd05ff85f2671431b72d3
>
>
> It's working, I've tested it, though I find it a little bit useless at
> the moment. Besides ladish, who needs it? Anyway, I don't think it's
> causing any harm to have it, so we can keep it enabled.
>
>   
Ok, thanks for your work.

>> Maybe it's also good to package Ladish.
>>     
>
> You must be joking. Ladish is in early development, has a preview-0.2
> version out and the majority of jackified apps don't support it. I've
> been talking to Nedko (the one and only ladish developer) yesterday, and
> he consideres it experimental. Not in the Debian sense of experimental,
> more as in pre-alpha.
>
> It also requires a patched jackd2, these patches are in nedko's private
> jackd2 repository. So until they got applied to jackd2, there's neither
> no use in jackdbus nor in ladish based on it.
Point taken. I don't think it's an good idea to use the ladi branch in 
jack2.
For packaging Ladish I thought you might package it also for experimental.

Anyway, I doubt whether I would spent much time on LASH stuff atm...

\r