[SCM] jackd2 packaging branch, master, updated. debian/1.9.5.dfsg-13-18-g7c7e31a
siretart at tauware.de
Tue Jun 15 14:09:24 UTC 2010
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 15:55:02 (CEST), Adrian Knoth wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 01:35:54PM +0000, adiknoth-guest at users.alioth.debian.org wrote:
>> The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
>> commit 0732d192e10a578b76d9075cdf0136445cae6304
>> Author: Adrian Knoth <adi at drcomp.erfurt.thur.de>
>> Date: Tue Jun 15 14:38:26 2010 +0200
>> Drop libjack-dev from jackd2.
>> Only jackd1 provides the dev package.
> Huu, this will result in a major usability issue. While it's fine for
> the buildds to always use jackd1, it's inconvenient for users who want
> to run jackd2 AND compile some jack apps on their own.
> It's a rather common use case, and given that jackd2 will be the default
> in squeeze, we need to address this issue.
> Is there a well-known approach? If not, here are the facts:
> * libjack-dev header files are fine also for jackd2 users
> * /usr/lib/pkgconfig/jack.pc: Dunno. Probably ok.
> * /usr/lib/libjack(server).a: Does anybody care?
> * /usr/lib/libjack(server).so are two symlinks to the full (package
> specific) version number, e.g., libjack.so.0.0.28.
> As long as jackd1 and jackd2 don't differ in the SOVERSION, we could
> manually symlink libjack.so->libjack.so.0 instead.
> I guess libjack-dev then needs to depend on libjack0 | libjack-0.116, so
> it can be installed with both jackd versions but still fetches libjack0
> on buildds.
> If there are better approaches, please let me know.
How about making jackd2 provide a binary package 'libjack-jackd2-dev'
that conflicts with libjack-dev?
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4
More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers