rtmpdump_2.2e-2_i386.changes ACCEPTED

[Sebastian Dröge]

On Thu, 2010-06-17 at 10:49 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 10:01:50 (CEST), Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> 
> > Am 07.06.2010 11:50, schrieb Sebastian Dröge:
> >> Or at least a -fPIC static library? :)
> >
> > Reinhard? I think the new ffmpeg 0.6 will also benefit from a -PIC
> > librtmp, isn't it?
> 
> indeed, but I don't remember what the consesus is. I propsed to just
> compile librtmp.a with -PIC, but I'm not sure if everyone agrees here?

You said previously that you prefer to wait for upstream to take the
shared library patch.

Upstream said, that compiling with -fPIC is what he suggests and that
this will only cause very minor performance degrations (you need to do
symbol relocation a single time per process or use prelink ;) ).

IMHO we should simply build librtmp with -fPIC
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20100617/151035e4/attachment.pgp>