Thoughts on pd object packaging - use of cdbs might be preferable?

[Hans-Christoph Steiner]

On Nov 12, 2010, at 12:30 PM, IOhannes zmölnig wrote:

> On 11/12/2010 06:10 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>
>> Ah yes, still learning my way around all the Debian tools, they are
>> pretty large.  A common snippet would be great, no argument here.
>
> so now, we only have to do it :-)
>
>> About the HURD/kFreeBSD issue, it seems to be a linking issue, do we
>> have to handle the linking differently with those kernels?  I guess  
>> the
>> Makefile is lacking uname detection for those kernels, since its  
>> looking
>> for 'Linux'.  Hopefully just using the same settings for the other  
>> two
>> kernels will work.
>
> yes, i think the only problem is that the Makefile thinks that it is
> compiling for an unknown target os (because uname returns something
> unknown), thus no CFLAGS, LDFLAGS,... are defined which means the
> defaults: the .c files are compiled as applications, which obviously
> won't work at all.
>
> and yes, you should be able to use the very same flags as on linux  
> (and
> see the other thread why it might be a good idea to keep pd_linux as  
> the
> filename extension for all debian)


Works for me.  I have a bunch of deadlines so I won't be able to touch  
this for a while.  That's why I just had a big rush of work: I wanted  
to get it in before I was saddled with lots of things.

.hc


----------------------------------------------------------------------------

"[T]he greatest purveyor of violence in the world today [is] my own  
government." - Martin Luther King, Jr.