fsateler at debian.org
Tue Nov 16 03:36:45 UTC 2010
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 12:58, Dan S <danstowell+debmm at gmail.com> wrote:
> 2010/11/14 Felipe Sateler <fsateler at debian.org>:
>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 12:15, Dan S <danstowell+debmm at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 2010/11/3 Felipe Sateler <fsateler at debian.org>:
>>>> By the way, the package needs to get the SONAME issue right, does
>>>> upstream have a stance on this?
>>> We have had a long-term stable ABI and that's generally the
>>> philosophy, but we agreed that we should version the lib names anyway.
>>> One of the other devs has a patch for it that they're digging out...
>> Any news on this?
> I've (today) sent a patchset to the sc-dev list which does the
> lib-versioning. Feel free to read the patches and feed back to me:
> Once they're in, I'll also need to remember to tweak the debian
> install so both the *.so and the *.so.1 get installed, then that
> should cover it.
I think the chdir option in scons breaks parallel builds. Other than
that, I think it is OK (although I haven't tested, I assume you did).
More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers