2nd package in Pd batch uploaded: pd-pmpd

Felipe Sateler fsateler at debian.org
Sun Sep 12 21:38:30 UTC 2010

On 12/09/10 16:04, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-08-29 at 21:44 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>> On 29/08/10 19:15, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 00:11 -0400, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>>> On Aug 21, 2010, at 8:07 PM, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>>>> (Please don't CC me)
>>>>> On 21/08/10 18:02, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>>>>> On Sat, 2010-08-21 at 15:45 -0400, Felipe Sateler wrote:
>>>>>>> On 21/08/10 15:10, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
>>>>>>>> Ok, so we got pd-motex uploaded, and I've been applying all the  
>>>>>>>> feedback
>>>>>>>> to my whole batch of packages.  So I hope this one is looking quite
>>>>>>>> polished.  I guess my only question is whether to put anything in  
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> debian/changelog since this is the first submission of this  
>>>>>>>> package to
>>>>>>>> Debian.
>>>>>>>> http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-multimedia/pd-pmpd.git;a=summary
>>>>>>> Comments:
>>>>>>> 1. Please don't tag releases that have not yet been uploaded to  
>>>>>>> debian
>>>>>>> (delete them with git tag -d before pushing). The person uploading  
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> release will tag it.
>>>>>> Oops, sorry, still learning the git-buildpackage tools.  Its fixed  
>>>>>> now.
>>>>> OK.
>>>>>>> 2. Perhaps it would be good to install the pdf manual?
>>>>>> Yup, good idea, its the only one of these libs to have a PDF manual.
>>>>>> The changes are now pushed to alioth!
>>>>> I think the manual should be built instead of just using the
>>>>> upstream-provided copy (what do other people think?). unoconv can be
>>>>> used for that.
>>>> Done and pushed. Seems to work ok.
>>> Any word on this package? I think it is ready for upload.
>> I can't right now (unoconv seems to be broken on my system and I don't
>> have time to look into it). Ping again in a few days if nobody has
>> uploaded it yet.
> So its definitely been more than a few days, and it seems that pd-pmpd
> has not been uploaded yet. So.. ping!

OK, I've tried it, and unoconv keeps failing. I believe unoconv does not
work under fakeroot (the same command works when not called under
fakeroot). I'll have to work around this by building it during the build
phase (moving the original pdf form the upstream tarball out of the way


Felipe Sateler

More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list