binary packages with explicit python2.5 build dependency

[Felipe Sateler]

On 09/26/2010 04:17 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Sent to you as a package maintainer or an uploader for one
> of the packages mentioned at
> 
>   http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2010/09/msg01832.html
> 
> At least one of the binary packages built by these source packages
> ends up with a dependency, recommendation or suggestion on python2.5
> without having an explicit build dependency on python2.5 or python2.5-dev.
> 
> Please fix this without reintroducing explicit build depedencies on
> python2.5 or python2.5-dev, if possible.
> 
> Thanks, Matthias

Looks like the uploaded package was built in a weird environment. I
cannot reproduce this on my amd64 sid box. I think a simple reupload
should suffice (unfortunately, pyliblo-utils is arch: all). BTW, do we
really need this package? AFAICS, it only duplicates what's found in
liblo-tools.

-- 
Saludos,
Felipe Sateler

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20100927/58b0f5c3/attachment.pgp>