slomo at circular-chaos.org
Tue Apr 19 19:02:08 UTC 2011
On Tue, 2011-04-19 at 18:56 +0000, Torsten Werner wrote:
> Hi maintainer,
> the package fails to comply with the LGPL. Quoting from the top level README:
> (LGPL, see www.gnu.org) with the following modification:
> 2. You agree not to enforce any patent claims for any aspect of
> MPEG audio compression, or any other techniques contained in
> the LAME source code.
> But the LPGL is clear:
> You may not impose any further restrictions on the recipients' exercise of the
> rights granted herein.
What exactly is wrong with this? Sure, it's not LGPL anymore and not
even LGPL compatible but by itself it should be a valid license.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers