Are libav and x264 DFSG-free now?
Eugen.Dedu at pu-pm.univ-fcomte.fr
Sat Aug 6 18:34:59 UTC 2011
On 06/08/11 19:43, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> On Sa, Aug 06, 2011 at 14:41:58 (CEST), Eugen Dedu wrote:
>> First, a minor incoherence: on
>> http://packages.qa.debian.org/liba/libav.html the maintainer field is
>> "Debian multimedia packages maintainers", while on
>> http://packages.qa.debian.org/x/x264.html it is "Debian Multimedia
>> Maintainers", even if both teams are the same team in fact.
> Oh, thanks, I'll update that on the next upload.
>> And now to my original question. I have looked on Internet without
>> finding the answer. I would like to know why libav (ffmpeg) and x264
>> are now found in main while before they were not. Why before they were
>> considered DFSG non-free, and now they are considered DFSG-free? Has
>> anything changed in the "patents" they code? Has DSFG-freeness changed?
>> Have ftp-master changed their mind? More generally, what has changed
>> between when they were non-free and now?
> I can reaffirm that Debian distributes both libav as well as x264 under
> the GPLv2, which is perfectly compliant with the DFSG. As for your
> question regarding patents, please a look at the Debian Patent FAQ:
> There may or may not be soon a libav-extra package in debian that is
> distributed under GPLv3, but that's probably unrelated to your question.
I still do not understand. You say that now they are compliant with
DFSG. But my main question is: what has changed between a few years ago
when those codecs were NOT in main, and now when they ARE in main?
Shouldn't they have been in main since the beginning then?
More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers