Package should be removed..

[Romain Beauxis]

Well my main concern is about the confusion that can result of having
two packages. I believe it would be important to know whether or not
the old icecast provides something that icecast2 does not..

On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Jonas Smedegaard <dr at jones.dk> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 09:33:41AM -0600, Romain Beauxis wrote:
>>
>> I agree though I am not sure whether Gerardo and Ivan were talking
>> about icecast 1 or 2..
>> I any case, I believe they are welcome to maintain either of them
>> among the multimedia team, right ?
>
> Sure!  Except if it is v1 they want to maintain and this team is hostile
> towards keeping that alive: Then they are better off doing it separately -
> but I cannot imagine us being hostile :-)
>
>
>  - Jonas
>
> --
>  * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
>  * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
>
>  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJNSC5MAAoJECx8MUbBoAEhyEcP/jGmxzDkyBkSPuJwgHeHCZLp
> 1XrcKLD4nvxFcbPyaLkSP24DVGMbiTEpEM+5n7UK051IY8zlepLZJKp8ypuyBZaY
> bXGh/kIiAxUDQEl89QFkdDyutcJTT3jj46EgiISAxkH37lfgRUxHdnKbCQGMBSgA
> 7QXfz9U5OrgGPRFyiO3hMJ00M3+JLnKI+0LDYz0nxi05OVsiLlsbR1CONKeizkI8
> y1TfuvdbRoYq0yssUgp8pSGGIi5PKxuVqvmg3k7bo4fyPaRFB/n8XjcZ0eFmL9ya
> J+ib7ZJIhkkcsZ1ayrInm0T1QATsKji2D0EvvKCnrZ6BbsHjpWO6DM+4zA4jOi81
> GtoxEl4RgBu2sNEqSz8nvGUWwxr2oeukcTbQ9G1dGLZLUULmTZdELp02zhJ+cwMw
> ECoUYTzst/xtpYWWpVCwWuPvuZ4ATR6HcROfpHpcYMtJpJtVz4GHcMdD4Qz/pifM
> uG4HPrG810cDqjnwlNZSjLUKdyxVFgSLrxzGnwyPvbrMEh2py2fdS1oamaatxVHa
> 1gLva8Gs0xdZ0Z4ZOxyUFQ/eH7TNatzMmBQT0O14G85WbxHcgjGoLCysu8c7PzqM
> oYe21dc7dH6Unj3uAaeDDDxOlTvgemqBMzw/Q1OyVxi59kkcrpc3g8cxo56P9tA/
> WdFN4+dWo7s7p8R7EA2f
> =GOiV
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>



-- 
They try to fool the black population,
By telling them that Jah Jah Dead.
But I&I know that...
Jah no dead!