Package should be removed..

[Ivan Diaz]

Hi All,

Yes you are right, icecast2 is the only active package and it don't make
sense have active the old release, in this case we support the idea that
icecast must be dropped and make it as transitional package to icecast2.

Thank you, and have a good day,

*Ivan, Gerardo*


2011/2/1 Jonas Smedegaard <dr at jones.dk>

> On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 10:46:59AM -0600, Romain Beauxis wrote:
>
>> Well my main concern is about the confusion that can result of having two
>> packages. I believe it would be important to know whether or not the old
>> icecast provides something that icecast2 does not..
>>
>
> Confusion on what packages do is solved by clarifying package description,
> not by dropping packages. :-)
>
>
>
>  - Jonas
>
> --
>  * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
>  * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/
>
>  [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJNSEE+AAoJECx8MUbBoAEhhQcP/itIPI2KLz51Cy9meMM9+fv+
> /nmjeEE/UgQq/HUi+47ly08tfSm/v4IIdO+VSX4VyP75wlJLZYNotDeMymGH8+1G
> 6Yawgt8LOpHXNwNobTjATwKfWsLks6fU5WP41bm8XB5EjqIOwrrqzJFIXTT4+aZm
> pAbxbahOqWNE8zqabyH9dmiaE406opobBgfcpka8IPT7WPiVp0TaTuqV0HuJxV5a
> dQMIIxOGskQwSxFPzV/AHtruBZkj/rtp99Covfj4yJJTOtUCOvqa135a+32o8vx0
> OzTZx51M3eTiEJTXLm22Bjyzzw80P0TL8hNk1MFMLYCUtS0iKLBgcX1CqlhWcnoD
> VD8Q6XgSVsShmNFUfOp6xF6U+UKA7mzppxi27RJRefba3IE0xoffH17RfY7oemhI
> Juz7qPknN4BV2yIJ6sJyrIzE4DQ4h414TMvGJjyLbYqDcp/qFxEWhifJBR03CLEn
> sZOTC+DcSwcdf9tbK69VRh7o9wwo53ciGBDD1H1C1o7fC3RhMyIVY5hvuZVvR8+/
> i/ozjY/oAHvR905gRI9KmMZaQulYWET98zMD6SObL5kD9xNXPtt12ZF2+rvu7pCj
> 9olP3adr+3eIT7/3pktAp3MPANlk5GYmIgsvzgND/KAdzTrGts4OODTkGHiNSRE9
> PZVBUedhSD/y+DfrPYk3
> =6Lqp
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20110201/bb38ee7e/attachment.htm>