Libsoundtouch{0,1}-dev?

[Benjamin Drung]

Am Mittwoch, den 02.02.2011, 15:23 +0100 schrieb Adrian Knoth:
> On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 02:54:37PM +0100, David Henningsson wrote:
> 
> > Ardour (perhaps among others) build-depends on libsoundtouch1-dev, but  
> > this is not built by the archive as soundtouch provides  
> > libsoundtouch-dev but not libsoundtouch1-dev. Is this just a typo in  
> > soundtouch packaging, or do we have a more serious problem?
> 
> The changelog in
> 
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/s/soundtouch/news/20110116T154758Z.html
> 
> says:
> 
>    * Rename libsoundtouch1c2 to libsoundtouch0 and libsoundtouch1-dev to
>      libsoundtouch0-dev so we comply with policy.
>      - Obsolete c2 naming due to CXX transition is not needed anymore.
>      - ardour used to provide libsoundtouch0 and libsoundtouch0-dev as
>        mentioned
>        in #271108. These packages were removed in 2004.
> 
> So looks like a "transition" to me, and we probably need to readjust
> ardour's build dependency (to libsoundtouch-dev). I can take care of
> this if agreed upon.

It's libsoundtouch0-dev. The question is: Why doesn't libsoundtouch-dev
exist?

-- 
Benjamin Drung
Debian & Ubuntu Developer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20110202/63db06ab/attachment.pgp>