Libav 0.7 FTBFS on mipsel: Error: opcode not supported on this processor: mips2 (mips2) `ldl $2, 7($13)'

Philipp Kern pkern at debian.org
Sun Jul 24 09:33:42 UTC 2011


On Sun, Jul 24, 2011 at 12:59:46AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 08:52:45PM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > I think that's a misconfiguration of the buildds.  They're supposed to
> > put linux32 into the schroot configuration if the kernel arch differs
> > from the userspace arch, to get the right entry into uname.
> Negative. The build have to work with even a complete different kernel
> architecture.

Since when do we require this?  I don't think we do that.  It might be a goal,
which you are free to propose.  (Mainly useful to build the right packages
on i386 userland with an amd64 kernel.)  The status quo is that such build
failures are not RC, AFAIK.

Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
-- 
 .''`.  Philipp Kern                        Debian Developer
: :' :  http://philkern.de                         Stable Release Manager
`. `'   xmpp:phil at 0x539.de                         Wanna-Build Admin
  `-    finger pkern/key at db.debian.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20110724/c7a938a7/attachment.pgp>


More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list