Please Backport Audacious

Cyril LAVIER cyril.lavier at davromaniak.eu
Tue Jun 21 15:03:36 UTC 2011


 On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 22:34:39 +0200, Cyril Lavier wrote:
> On 06/19/2011 05:44 PM, Cyril Lavier wrote:
>> On 06/19/2011 04:14 PM, rent0n wrote:
>>> On 16/06/11 17:47, Cyril Lavier wrote:
>>>> On 06/16/2011 05:47 PM, rent0n wrote:
>>>>> Hello everyone,
>>>>>
>>>>> Would anybody be interested in backporting 'audacious' and
>>>>> 'audacious-plugins' from testing to Squeeze?
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't think Audacious needs any presentation, being one of the 
>>>>> most
>>>>> used and loved music players.
>>>>> The testing version (2.4,4) brings some very nice improvements 
>>>>> and new
>>>>> features over 2.3. Plus, it also fix some very annoying bugs.
>>>>>
>>>>> Volunteers?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks!
>>>>>
>>>> Hi.
>>>>
>>>> For this purpose, I've added the Debian Multimedia Maintainers 
>>>> list,
>>>> maybe somebody will be available to fulfill your request.
>>>>
>>>> Also, there is a 2.5.1 released mid may, and an alpha released few 
>>>> days
>>>> ago. Maybe it will make more sense to wait until the 2.5.1 is 
>>>> uploaded
>>>> to testing to think about a backport. I also think the packaging 
>>>> team is
>>>> focused on including the 3.0 release in testing.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Thanks for cc'ing the Debian Multimedia Maintainers list, I guess 
>>> there might be some folks interested in backporting Audacious there.
>>>
>>> I see your point, waiting for 2.5 could make sense, but in my view 
>>> 2.4 is already a big improvement over 2.3 and has the advantage of 
>>> being already in testing, ready to be backported.
>>>
>>> So, if anyone's interested, please raise your hand, having 2.4 in 
>>> Squeeze would be great!
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>> Hi.
>>
>> If there is nobody from the Debian Multimedia Maintainers team which 
>> is interested. I may fill the void, and try to do some work on the 
>> backport.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
> Hi.
>
> Here a first version, it works (I've tested it).
>
> There's a lot of things to backport, so in the next days, I will try
> to change audacious and audacious-plugins build dependencies to avoid
> backporting so many packages. It also needs the libvpx backport which
> I made for chromium.
>
> http://www.davromaniak.eu/vrac/backports/audacious/
>
> If anybody can test it or review it.
>
> For testing it, you can use my repository :
> http://ddb.davromaniak.eu/ (deb http://ddb.davromaniak.eu/
> squeeze-backports main).
>
> Thanks.
 Hi again.

 Today, I worked on cleaning these packages.

 And apparently, I don't need to recompile barely the whole world to 
 backport audacious.

 We just need the libmowgli, audacious and audacious-plugins packages.

 I changed the versions needed for build dependencies on the 
 audacious-plugins package, and I didn't see any problems during 
 compilation and when testing the software.

 So I've updated the folder : 
 http://www.davromaniak.eu/vrac/backports/audacious/

 Thanks.
-- 
 Cyril "Davromaniak" Lavier



More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list