[SCM] crtmpserver/master: Split package to 4 parts

[Reinhard Tartler]

I noticed crtmpserver on PET hanging around, waiting for a reviewer and
I took a look at it.

On Fr, Jul 29, 2011 at 15:04:17 (CEST), Andriy Beregovenko wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Thursday 28 July 2011 14:04:39 Alessio Treglia you wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 8:25 AM,  <jet-guest at users.alioth.debian.org> wrote:
>> > The following commit has been merged in the master branch:
>> > commit 589879437b6083106bb2ffa4a09ec6fff7cd5b0c
>> > Author: Andriy Beregovenko <jet at jet.kiev.ua>
>> > Date:   Thu Jul 28 01:31:05 2011 +0300
>> > 
>> >    Split package to 4 parts
>> > 
>> >    libs will install only basic libs (common and thelib)
>> >    apps will install only applications
>> >    main will install main binary, doc, examples, init script and basic
>> > configuration file
>> 
>> \o/
>> 
>> What's the rationale?
>
> In fact, this software is the platform that consists of several components:
> - the main component library;
> - applications that use these libraries;
> - actually the main executable file / daemon and supported files like docs, 
> configs etc...
>
> We can install only crtmpserver-libs and crtmpserver-dev and makes own 
> software.

Do you do this? Do you have any indication that there are users doing
this? I'm asking because I notice the libs are installed in a private
path, so this isn't directly accessible. Of course you can override this
with proper linker paths, but there is neither documentation nor helper
scripts/pkg-config files that would assist with that.

Moreover, the package descriptions don't really explain what's going on,
so I have doubts that the split in the current form is helpful for the
users.

I also note that the .orig.tar gz is an svn checkout. Please use 'svn
export' instead.

For the next upload (the package is RC buggy atm, after all), what shall
we do? Shall we revert the fix, or do we want to keep it?

Cheers,
Reinhard

-- 
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4