libaacs_0.3.0-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

[Reinhard Tartler]

On Fr, Jan 13, 2012 at 15:25:06 (CET), Andres Mejia wrote:

> On Jan 13, 2012 6:40 AM, "Alessio Treglia" <alessio at debian.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:30 AM, Fabian Greffrath <fabian at greffrath.com>
> wrote:
>> > Should the packages get built twice, once without optimization for the
> debug
>> > package and once with optimization for the actual shared library
> package? Or
>> > is it necessary to disable all optimizations in the ragular shared
> library
>> > package in order for the debug package to work?
>>
>> Actually the default -g -02 would be the best, -03
>> -fomit-frame-pointer (and other optimizations) should be stripped out,
>> I think.
>
> I prefer leaving upstreams optimizations intact. Anyone wanting to debug
> these libraries can just build them from sources and install them to some
> temp location (their home directory for example).
>
> I personally don't bother with any dog packages.
>
> And please leave the default optimizations for libbluray.

Did you benchmark this and can show that it indeed improves performance?
If not, I'd rather suggest to follow the recommendations of debian
policy and/or developers reference (can't remember exactly which of
these two).

Cheers,
Reinhard

-- 
Gruesse/greetings,
Reinhard Tartler, KeyID 945348A4