Bug#688841: downgrading

[Etienne Millon]

* Fabian Greffrath <fabian at greffrath.com> [120927 09:50]:
> Am 26.09.2012 19:44, schrieb Etienne Millon:
> >Downgrading as there was no previous armel package built.
> 
> But isn't armel a release arch for wheezy and thus FTBFS=RC?

I think it's not because :
  
  - there was no previous binary package so it does not block eventual
    migrations. eg, zsnes will be the same situation when it will
    be "Arch: any-i386" : a FTBFS on hurd won't be a regression.

  - glyr isn't part of wheezy, so even if it was RC it would be
    acceptable (ie, not part of wheezy RC bugs)

Anyway, I'll prepare a package in a few days, in order to fix #688821
too.

-- 
Etienne Millon