vlc/vlc-nox distinction

[Sebastian Ramacher]

On 2014-08-19 09:05:52, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 19.08.2014, 02:13 +0200 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher: 
> > Let me know what you think.
> 
> Looks reasonable!
> 
> I have one suggestion: Couldn't we dynamically populate the
> debian/vlc{,-nox}.install files with the plugins, based on the decision
> if their dependency check against lib{x11,xcb} fails or not?

I guess we could. But we would still need to have a list of plugins that
we don't want in vlc-nox but in vlc somewhere. For example, the
visulization plugins and the XDG screensever plugin do not link against
libX11 or libxcb and are placed in vlc. They do not make sense in
vlc-nox.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20140819/19251ac3/attachment.sig>