concerning llibva backport

Sebastian Ramacher sramacher at debian.org
Sat Aug 6 09:12:06 UTC 2016


On 2016-08-05 16:03:39, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> On 5 August 2016 at 09:43, Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher at debian.org> wrote:
> > On 2016-07-29 06:40:07, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
> >> On 29 July 2016 at 06:28,  <sten-guest at users.alioth.debian.org> wrote:
> >> > The branch, jessie-backports has been created
> >> >         at  b40f4e34eed7e6e9f3225aa28f8ac9963d509747 (commit)
> >> >
> >> > - Shortlog ------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > commit b40f4e34eed7e6e9f3225aa28f8ac9963d509747
> >> > Author: Nicholas D Steeves <nsteeves at gmail.com>
> >> > Date:   Fri Jul 29 06:25:56 2016 -0400
> >> >
> >> >     Backport 1.7.1-1 to Jessie.
> >> >
> >>
> >> I figured out a way to a hack to work around the gbp build failure
> >> that is fixed in 1.7.1-2 UNRELEASED.  Briefly, in ~/.gbp.conf:  change
> >> the cleaner line under [DEFAULT] to "cleaner = true" ;-)  Please
> >> upload the libva bpo and this one simultaneously.
> >
> > I'm not in the backports ACL. You'll need another DD to sponsor the upload.
> >
> > Cheers
> > --
> > Sebastian Ramacher
> 
> Hi Sebastian,
> 
> I did a fresh build of libva-1.7.1-1~bpo+1 today, and noticed that it
> was building against mesa-10.3.2-1+deb8u1 from Jessie.  I've been
> testing it on a Jessie+backported mesa-11.1.3-1~bpo8+1, and the
> packages I've been testing have also been built against mesa-10.3.x.
> Do you think it's ok to build against mesa 10.3.2, or should we bump
> the build deps of libva to pull in mesa from jessie-backports.  I'm in
> favour of bumping the deps asap.

NACK. The mesa build dependency does not matter at all. The only intersting
thing is libdrm vor intel-vaapi-driver.

> Additionally, I think it would also
> be wise to bump the intel-vaapi-driver build-depend on libdrm-dev to
> prevent it from being built against libdrm-2.4.58-2.

This was recently bumped to match the upstream requirement. There is not other
bumping needed.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-multimedia-maintainers/attachments/20160806/5d62591e/attachment.sig>


More information about the pkg-multimedia-maintainers mailing list