[Pkg-net-snmp-devel] Bug#557434: libsnmp-base: Asks (with high priority) to download non-free bits on installation
Jochen Friedrich
jochen at scram.de
Tue Nov 24 18:13:36 UTC 2009
Hi Vincent,
> libsmi2-common contains just MIB. Some packages sets an explicit
> dependency on this package (wireshark-common and python-pysnmp4) and
> therefore should suggests the future contrib package that will replace
> it.
That's perfect.
>> I'm really into moving the MIB installation to a package in contrib. This
>> package should probably depend on libsmi2 as smistrip does a better job than
>> the script included in the net-snmp package.
Oops, my fault. Both smistrip versions are almost the same. Someone should
probably merge the patches from smistrip of net-snmp into smistrip of libsmi2.
> libsmi2-common also contains many more MIB than the previous version of
> libsnmp-base but this is a lot of files that should be checked for their
> licenses. We could just package a non-free package from libsmi2 sources
> with those MIB (provided we do the license check). This would allow to
> ship MIB without downloading anything. We should just create a dummy
> package suggesting the non-free one and containing some note about the
> necessity to install the non-free package to get MIB. Applications
> requiring MIB may depend on this dummy package or suggests the non-free
> one.
If there is such a way, we should package the currently available MIBs. I
just updated rfclist from the list at www.simpleweb.org to get the newest
ietf MIBs.
By the way, would it make sense to build a SNMP task force (maybe on alioth)
and coordinate such stuff there?
Thanks,
Jochen
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: rfclist
URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-net-snmp-devel/attachments/20091124/1546b047/attachment.asc>
More information about the Pkg-net-snmp-devel
mailing list