Upcoming testing migration for X

Adam D. Barratt adam at adam-barratt.org.uk
Sat Apr 9 18:53:27 UTC 2011


On Sat, 2011-04-09 at 20:24 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt <adam at adam-barratt.org.uk> (09/04/2011):
> > Having been looking at some test runs this afternoon, it looks like we
> > can mostly get this and the kernel done if we also:
> > 
> > - age xf86-video-omapfb
> > 
> > - remove nvidia-graphics-modules (#614089) and xf86-video-glamo
> > (#614453); maintainers CCed, both packages would be free to re-enter
> > testing once fixed.
> 
> I think there's x-x-video-openchrome too.

There's a new version which is just reaching 10 days and which britney's
happy to migrate.

> > There's one small issue - xserver-xorg-input-{ev,fb}dev-udeb/sparc
> > now depend on xserver-xorg-core-udeb, which doesn't exist on sparc
> 
> Ah, unforeseen issue with having proper dependencies against the
> server now. Any chance it could be forced it with that known issue?

It can, it just means a moderately large force-hint :-) (coming soon to
a hints file near you).

[...]
> Those udebs aren't used on sparc anyway, so if you have a way to force
> them in, we could keep track of the (consequence-less) “breakage” in a
> bug, and I think everything else should be fine?

That sounds okay.  Please don't make that bug RC until we've migrated
everything though, or I'll just have to add another hint to ignore
that. :)

Regards,

Adam




More information about the pkg-nvidia-devel mailing list