[Pkg-octave-devel] Octave-forge for 2.9

[Thomas Weber]

Am Mittwoch, den 03.05.2006, 10:59 +0200 schrieb Rafael Laboissiere:
> * Thomas Weber <thomas.weber.mail at gmail.com> [2006-05-03 07:52]:
> I think we can only release the package if it passes all tests.  We might
> disable some tests and/or do not install the problematic *.oct files, I
> think this would be okay.

I'll see about it.


> > You mean in the same way as the in/ directory in current Octave? Fine
> > with me; however, I think we should handle the changelog in the same
> > way. I don't like the way we are mixing the changelog entries for Octave
> > 2.1 and 2.9 currently.
> 
> Could you elaborate more on this?  What are the problems we see with the
> mixed entries?

There are no problems. I'm just not happy with having 2.9 related stuff
in the changelog of 2.1 and vice-versa. 


> > Is there a simple way to 'step' through an .m file? I worked on #361982
> > yesterday, but finding the correct file and line with the problem is a
> > pain, if one can only use 'keyboard'.
> 
> I do not know.  What about asking in help at octave.org?

Well, I thought you had an idea :). Okay, I'll ask the list.

	Thomas