[Pkg-octave-devel] Uploading the octave-forge packages

Thomas Weber thomas.weber.mail at gmail.com
Fri Apr 4 15:17:26 UTC 2008


On 04/04/08 14:44 +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> > > 2) octave-special-matrix will be put on hold.  As Thomas pointed out, this
> > >    package is an overkill.
> > 
> > How about adding the .m file to the miscellanous package?
> 
> Yes, this was the original idea.

Okay, will do.

> > > 3) The debian/copyright must be extensively reviewed, in order to meet the
> > >    Debian standards.  Perhaps we could switch to the new proposed format [1]?
> > 
> > I've started a review. How about a simple TODO file somewhere for
> > unclear files?
> 
> What do you mean, exactly?

Keeping track of unkclear cases. For example, sample.wav in the audio
package lacks any license. Taking the DESCRIPTION as license source,
this would mean GPL-2+. That is not good, as we don't have the source
for the .wav file and I don't think someone created it with a hex
editor.

	Thomas



More information about the Pkg-octave-devel mailing list