[Pkg-octave-devel] Lenny release goals for the DOG
Rafael Laboissiere
rafael at debian.org
Mon Mar 3 11:35:44 UTC 2008
* Thomas Weber <thomas.weber.mail at gmail.com> [2008-03-03 12:28]:
> Am Montag, den 03.03.2008, 12:19 +0100 schrieb Rafael Laboissiere:
> > * Thomas Weber <thomas.weber.mail at gmail.com> [2008-03-03 07:36]:
> >
> > > But my aim is to get rid of octave2.1 before Lenny's release.
> >
> > I am not sure this should be done for lenny or for lenny+1.
>
> If we have every Octave related package available for 3.0, why not for
> Lenny?
It is just a conservative thinking. We have the tradition in Debian of
ensuring smooth transitions. Who knows about users who are still using
octave2.1 for whichever reason (old, non-3.0-compatible scripts running
batches, for instance).
We might change the description of octave2.1 and add a loud warning telling
that the package will disappear in lenny+1.
That said, if a majority of people here thinks we must drop octave2.1, I
will follow the decision.
--
Rafael
More information about the Pkg-octave-devel
mailing list